I think I know Amy Winehouse.
… or at least her doppelganger.
I was ready to have a usual day - woke up late, drank too much coffee within an hour, shaking like a banshee from all the caffeine, ironed my towels, spit in my waffle batter - and it seemed that things were going just swimmingly when I saw this headline:
“Amy Winehouse to perform at Grammy Awards via Satellite“
This was after a headline I half-noticed yesterday saying that she wasn’t performing because the US denied her a visa (go figure). Evidently they’re making it up to her, by letting her “perform via satellite”. Think about it. You’re Amy Winehouse, you’re all cracked out with a cocktail of illicits just STREAMING from your nose, and the country hosting the Grammy Awards DENYS you. Your first reaction is probably to go on a bender, one of those “fuck those guys” benders. The “I don’t fuckin need you anyway” type benders.
And then they turn around and say, “well… you can perform via satellite.”
Huh?
What she should do is tell them to fuck off and check herself into rehab, or at very least beam back to the mothership and stop devouring the collective consciousnesses of every fuckup who just adoooores her “talent”.
But if I were her… hehehe… this is where it gets interesting… if I were her, I’d “perform” and right in the middle of it start shooting up and just die right there on the stage.
Yeah. That’d be awesome.
-Seeing as the news probably would have not been released about her performance unless she had already agreed (did I just state the media has some sense of responsibilty as in fact checking paah!) I assume she doesn’t have anything up her sleeve. I am assuming that it can’t be worse than anything Britney Spears has not already done. They do seem to have a fierce competition of sorts.
crazymonkey909 said this on February 8, 2008 at 1:44 pm
Hah! A drug-off.
KB said this on February 8, 2008 at 1:51 pm
i love her. i hope she gets better shes so awersome
hjo said this on June 28, 2008 at 3:27 am